Guardian Chronicle
BUILDING BRIDGES TO LAW ENFORCEMENT,
COMMUNITY, YOUTH & YOU
Photos featured in NYC Televison and Print Media: The New York Beacon News, The Chief Leader, The Bronx Times, The Amsterdam News, COBA & CCA Union News Papers, New York Times Best Seller,:The Lost Son, A Life in Pursuit of Justice, & 2008-American Corrections by Todd R. Clear, George E. Cole, & Michael D. Reisig 8th Edition- page 558
Ralph E. Smith -Publisher HomePage
GUARDIAN CHRONICLE ENDORSEMENT NORMAN SIEGEL PUBLIC ADVOCATE May 25, 2009 Written by Ralph E. Smith- Publisher
Imam Umar Abdul-Jalil is an example of an outstanding Chaplain and Assistant Norman Siegel represented The Grand council membership, and The Guardian Chronicle News Paper Website Law suit to renew their NYPD Press Pass. Norman Siegel for over 25 years has stood shoulder to shoulder with the Guardian The Guardian Chronicle is proud to stand with Mr. Norman Siegel as our Respectfully' Ralph E Smith Public Relations Director
|
Norman Siegel has been on the front line with members of the
GRAND COUNCIL OF GUARDIANS ENDORSE
Guardian Chronicle Magazine: "The Guardian Chronicle is proud to stand with Mr. Norman Siegel as our candidate for the next New York City Public Advocate. Norman Siegel has been the voice for the New York City Worker. Now it's time to stand and let your voice be heard: Vote for Norman Siegel for Public Advocate!" guardianchronicle.com
Norman Siegel's Letter To Members of the Grand Council of Guardians OPEN LETTER TO ALL GUARDIAN ASSOCIATIONS N.Y.C. Correction Guardians, N.Y.C Police Department, N.Y.S., N.Y.S Court Guardians, N.Y.S. Parole Guardians, N.Y.S Correction Guardians, N.Y.C Probation Guardians, N.Y.C. Sheriff Guardians, N.Y.S. Police Guardians Westchester N.B.P.A, Nassau County Sheriff Guardians, Westchester Correction Guardians, M.T.A Police Guardians Nassau County Police Guardians Dear Guardians,
When Imam Umar Abdul-Jalil was suspended by the Department of Correction for political comments they found offensive, I stood up for his first-amendment right, as a public employee, to speak out on matters of public concern. When Senator Eric Adams was targeted for criticizing his superiors on police-race relations, I defended him. I hope to again be his ally as a social-justice-minded elected official, because there aren’t enough people like us in government. I have represented and strategized with so many of you on issues such as unequal promotions, hiring procedures and community relations. In short, I have been doing the exact job of the Public Advocate since before there was a Public Advocate. I am committed to fulfilling the vast potential of this office, but I can’t do it alone. I need your help. My campaign comes from the grassroots and is fueled by the energy of activists like you. Receiving the endorsement of the Guardians is a great honor. Now I am asking you to reinforce that endorsement with your personal financial support. Every contribution from a New York City resident up to $175 is matched 6-to-1 by public funds. That means your contribution of $50 is worth $350, your $100 contribution is worth $700 and a $175 contribution to our effort is worth $1225 to spread our message across the city. Every dollar counts; to qualify for these m atching funds, my campaign needs to raise a total of $125,000 by July 11. Please send in your contribution today to New Yorkers for Norman Siegel, 260 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 or go to www.normansiegel.com to make your contribution on-line.
|
Norman Siegel's 14 point approach to the Office of the Public Advocate
The backbone of my campaign and my desire to serve as New York City’s Public Advocate is my vision for how this unique elected position – the only position in America that represents the people against the government – can operate as an example of democracy in action. No New Yorker would have to ask “what does the Public Advocate do?” if I were in charge of the office. The City Charter specifies in section 24g, “The public advocate shall establish procedures for receiving and processing complaints, responding to complaints, conducting investigations, and reporting findings, and shall inform the public about such procedures.” Accordingly, I’ve outlined fourteen procedures and approaches I would use to make the office more dynamic and accessible:
1. I will not only contact the appropriate city agencies when it is appropriate, but I will also connect concerned residents and community groups to the appropriate agencies, so they do not get the run-around when trying to deal with city bureaucracies.
2. The Public Advocate has access to the media, and he or she should use it. The Public Advocate’s office will put pressing issues into New York’s papers by writing letters to the editor and opinion editorials on a constant basis.
3. Similarly, our office will hold press conferences to keep New York’s journalists apprised of the problems people are facing, and the work our office and our partners are doing to fix them.
4. A Public Advocate cannot understand the concerns of the City without going directly to the people. That is why we will hold public conferences/town hall meetings throughout the five boroughs to allow residents to give feedback about the difficulties they are facing.
5. Not only will I hold meetings in all five boroughs, but I will also decentralize the office. I would establish satellite Public Advocate offices in each borough, not just the municipal building in downtown Manhattan. No advocate waits for people to come with their problems; advocacy is about taking the first step by reaching out to people in their own neighborhoods.
6. Once a problem has been identified, the Public Advocate’s office will designate a task force to speedily gather information, make recommendations, and if necessary, take action.
7. If a task force is insufficient, I will not hesitate to create Public Advocate Commissions that can hold hearings, issue reports, and bring additional media attention to an issue.
8. If our office identifies an issue that warrants substantial study, we will commission Special Reports and have experts look into those issues.
9. There will be times when new legislation will be required to solve the issues we face. Under my direction, the Public Advocate’s office will be aggressive in recommending and supporting new legislation.
10. As Public Advocate, I will encourage and participate in all protected First Amendment action events, including marches, rallies and protests.
11. One of the most important features of the Public Advocate’s office is its authority to hold public hearings. When dealing with City agencies accused of wrongdoing, one can be assured that holding hearings is a tool I will use liberally. Additionally, New York law allows the Public Advocate to petition for judicial public hearings when there has been any showing of government impropriety, which allows the public to hear the acts in a court of law. As a civil rights attorney representing taxpayers I used this process to bring public attention to the “slush fund” that had been funneling city money to fictitious organizations. That case is currently on appeal in the New York Appellate Division. The incumbent has never asked for judicial hearings, but I will show no such reluctance in exposing government improprieties, such as fraud and corruption.
12. I would create an Institute of Advocacy where the Public Advocate staff would quarterly hold weekend training sessions on the “art of advocacy.” The goal would be to create a citywide network of skilled advocates.
13. To this end, I would recruit, train and supervise hundreds of volunteers (assistant Public Advocates) to participate in weekly intakes at housing developments, public libraries, and senior centers, identifying the systemic issues and recurring grievances that are plaguing city government.
14. As a last resort, the Public Advocate’s office will engage in litigation. We will sue for declaratory judgments, injunctive relief, or, in state court, for a judicial public hearing.
I will employ all of the above energetically and forcefully, because I see the Public Advocate’s office as the culmination of a lifetime of work, not just a political stepping stone.